Find out why a top-ten mortgage lender with a proprietary loan origination system (LOS) needed to convert from a legacy document platform.
Texas has historically been very protective of the homestead rights of its residents — so much so that these rights are set forth in the state’s constitution. Other than liens and judgments that attach under federal law such as federal tax liens, an individual’s homestead may only be encumbered in Texas if it is an encumbrance specifically authorized by the Texas Constitution. As a result, the decision as to whether a property should be classified as the borrower’s “homestead” for purposes of Texas law is important, particularly if the borrower will receive any cash back from the loan.
Any loan secured by the borrower’s homestead which is structured to provide cash back to the borrower must be treated as a Texas home equity loan or what is often called an “(a)(6)” loan due to the constitutional provision which allows the encumbrance. If a borrower only owns one property in Texas, lenders may choose to allow a borrower to receive cash back on a loan (frequently referred to as a cash out loan) without the loan being documented as an (a)(6) provided the following are true:
As always, we recommend that lenders verify with their investors that this approach will be acceptable and that the resulting loan will be eligible for sale as a non-homestead ‘investment’ cash-out loan.
Borrowers who own multiple properties in Texas may enter into cash out loans on any non-homestead property provided they have disclaimed that property as their homestead. However, if a borrower only owns one property and that property is in Texas, the Texas property will be deemed to be the borrower’s homestead and any cash out loan will be treated as an (a)(6) unless the lender is willing to close it as non-homestead ‘investment’ as described above.
In this blog concerning legal and regulatory matters of interest to the mortgage industry, Sandler Law Group (SLG) provides general information and industry observations that are not motivated by or concerned with a particular past occurrence or event, or a specific existing legal problem of which SLG is aware. Nothing published herein is intended to constitute legal advice and the use of the newsletter by a reader shall not give rise to an attorney-client relationship with SLG. SLG expressly disclaims any representation of accuracy or reliability as to the content of this newsletter, as well as any obligation to maintain such content over time or to ensure it is free from errors. Brad Cope is the attorney responsible for the SLG content of this newsletter. The attorneys of SLG are not certified by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Find out why a top-ten mortgage lender with a proprietary loan origination system (LOS) needed to convert from a legacy document platform.
Learn more about the Goals Module and its key monitoring and reporting features.
Learn about the changes of state consumer protection and the responsibility of financial services institutions to pursue operational excellence and a culture of compliance.